लैटर फ्रॉम रबी

Fwd: copy of the email sent on 8th June to OBC is marked to Anti Corruption investigating Core Healthcare

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Oct 17, 2005 9:48 PM
Subject: copy of the email sent on 8th June to OBC is marked to Anti Corruption investigating Core Healthcare
To: knprithviraj@obc.co.in, mailto:cmd@obc.co.in, rmadhok@obc.co.in, akmishra@obc.co.in, rh_ahm@obc.co.in, mailto:edp_ahm@obc.co.in, vidya.rudra@obcmail.co.in
Cc: cr-acb-ahd@gujarat.gov.in, mailto:addir-acb-ahd@gujarat.gov.in

From Pankaj S Mody

email id : modyps@gmail.com

dated 17th October 2005

The Chairman and Managing Director

Oriental Bank of Commerce

New Delhi

Subject : Core Health care term loan from GTB

Kindly furnish detailed reply to the Anti Corruption Bureau to the email sent to you while marking a copy to me

so that they can examine the collusion of Core Health care with the management of GTB .

I am enclosing of present email to Anti Corruption Bureau so that they can examine the matter in depth.

Your failure to give a transparent reply to the Investigating agency would mean that the you and management of OBC has

also colluded with the management of Core Health care and Jatin Jalundhwala.

Yours truly,

Pankaj S Mody

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 8, 2005 4:46 PM
Subject: Fwd: ERSTWHILE GLOBAL TRUST BANK ON CG ROAD -AHMEDABAD GIVING FRAUDULENTLY LOAN OF RS 12.5 CRORES TO CORE HEATLH CARE BY CREATING CHARGE ON IMMOVEABLE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR PARIMAL CROSSING -AHMEDABAD
To: cmd@obc.co.in, mailto:akmishra@obc.co.in, rh_ahm@obc.co.in, edp_ahm@obc.co.in, vidya.rudra@obcmail.co.in
Cc: dbsahmedabad@rbi.org.in, dbshyderabad@rbi.org.in, dbsnewdelhi@rbi.org.in, sucheta dalal <mailto:suchetadalal@yahoo.com>

The CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

NEW DELHI

cmd@obc.co.in,

A K MISHRA , GENERAL MANAGER,

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

NEW DELHI

akmishra@obc.co.in

THE REGIONAl HEAD

ORIETNAL BANK OF COMMERCE

CHANYKYA , 4TH FLOOR ,NEAR DINESH HALL

OFF ASHRAM ROAD

PHONE 26587539, 26585830, FAX -26589456

rh_ahm@obc.co.in, edp_ahm@obc.co.in

Sir,

I am annexing email sent to Ms. VIDYA RUDRA , ERSTWHILE GTB BRANCH AT CG ROAD , AHMEDABAD for your reference and information.

Your silence confirms that the creation of charge was illegal and fraudulent and you are accepting that you have encroaching the property illegally.

I am passing on the information to various investigating agencies other than Reserve Bank of India on account of your indifference and lack of transparency.

Please note that she has also maintained silence meaning that she accepts that she does not have any defense and she accepts that the possession notice given was illegal and also confirms that this has the blessings of the management of Oriental Bank of Commerce which includes present Chairman and Managing Director of Oriental Bank of Commerce.

Thanking you.

Yours sincerely,

Pankaj S Mody

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pankaj mody <mailto:modyps@gmail.com>

Date: Jun 7, 2005 3:29 PM
Subject: Fwd: ERSTWHILE GLOBAL TRUST BANK ON CG ROAD -AHMEDABAD GIVING FRAUDULENTLY LOAN OF RS 12.5 CRORES TO CORE HEATLH CARE BY CREATING CHARGE ON IMMOVEABLE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR PARIMAL CROSSING -AHMEDABAD
To: vidya.rudra@obcmail.co.in

From :

Pankaj S Mody

Janmangal Apt,

40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Soc

Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006

Email :- modyps@gmail.com

7^th June 2005

To

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE ( erstwhile Global Trust Bank)

C G Road

Ahmedabad

Email address: - vidya.rudra@obcmail.co.in

PHONE :- 91-79-26405595, FAX- 91-79-26405597

Madam,

FOR KIND ATTENTION OF Ms VIDYA RUDRA

I am sending a copy of email sent to your superiors earlier and till date they have neither acknowledged nor have given a reply.

When I spoke to you today in your office at about 1:30 PM , it appeared that you did not receive the communication from your superiors. This shows their indifference and negligence on the part of management of Oriental Bank of Commerce.

Hence , I am marking copy of my earlier emails to you.

It appears from the talks I had with you that either you and your staff lacks the expertise and competency in examining the acts of fraud and lack of due diligence or you and your staff deliberately play innocent and ignorant to serve the interest of the Bank. to carry on open loot unscrupulously and shamelessly.

Kindly go through the same and furnish a detailed satisfactory reply backed by detailed documentary evidences failing which it would be construed that you are personally colluding with Jatin Jalundhwala , Core Health care in retaining charge fraudulently .

It is imperative that you vacate the charge and make alternate arrangement with Jatin Jalundhwala and Core Health care for recovery of your dues immediately including filing of criminal against them and their associates immediately .

Your silence would amount to the fact that you and your bank openly accept that the charge created on immoveable property was illegal and you do not have defence.

It was the duty of your superiors to inform you immediately as regards to the contents of my earlier email dated 3 ^rd June 2005 ( and other emails from time to time) and as it appears that your superiors and colleagues have not informed you , I look forward to your reply latest by tomorrow evening with necessary detailed and satisfactory reply backed by detailed documentary evidences, records, correspondence, etc.

I am passing on the present email to various investigating agencies and hence , it is necessary that you file criminal complaint against Jatin Jalundhwala and Sushil Handa spontaneously as well as the concerned associates immediately and holding them in custody

Kindly acknowledge receipt of present email.

Thanking You.

Yours sincerely,

PANKAJ S MODY

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pankaj mody <mailto:modyps@gmail.com>
Date: Jun 3, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: ERSTWHILE GLOBAL TRUST BANK ON CG ROAD -AHMEDABAD GIVING FRAUDULENTLY LOAN OF RS 12.5 CRORES TO CORE HEATLH CARE BY CREATING CHARGE ON IMMOVEABLE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR PARIMAL CROSSING -AHMEDABAD

To: cmd@obc.co.in, akmishra@obc.co.in, rh_ahm@obc.co.in, edp_ahm@obc.co.in
Cc: dbsahmedabad@rbi.org.in, dbshyderabad@rbi.org.in, dbsnewdelhi@rbi.org.in, hcguj@guj.nic.in , helpahmedabad@rbi.org.in

From:-

Pankaj S Mody

Janmangal Flat

40 Brhaman Mitra Manda Society

Ahmedabad 380 006

modyps@gmail.com

03-06-2005

1)

THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

NEW DELHI

Email : cmd@obc.co.in,

2)

MR. A.K. MISHRA , GENERAL MANAGER (VIGILANCE)

NEW DELHI,

Email : akmishra@obc.co.in

3)

THE REGIONAL HEAD

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

CHANAYKYA , 4^TH FLOOR, NEAR DINESH HALL

OFF ASHRAM ROAD

PHONE: 26587539,26585830, FAX 26589456

Email : rh_ahm@obc.co.in , edp_ahm@obc.co.in

4)

Erstwhile Global Trust Bank

G-2 SAMEDH, NEAR ASSOCIATED PETROL PUMP

C.G. ROAD

AHMEDABAD

PHONE : 91-79-26405595, FAX 91-79-26405597

Sir,

SUBJECT:- GTB BRANCH ON CG ROAD IN AHMEDABAD EXTENDING OF TERM LOAN OF RS 12.5 CRORES TO CORE HEALTH CARE BY CREATING CHARGE ON IMMOVEABLE PORPERTY UNDER SIGNATURE OF JATIN JALUNDHWALA

1. This is in reference my earlier emails addressed to OBC FROM time to time for charge created by GTB for Rs 12.5 crore. You have failed to give satisfactory and transparent detailed reply to my emails deliberately. The earlier emails are adduced herewith. Kindly send fax to the branch located on CG Road in Ahmedabad immediately.

2. I would like to draw your attention that the next date for criminal defamation case 3326/99 is fixed on 15-06-2005 in the Metropolitan Court 22 at Meghaninagar. Kindly furnish detailed reply to the points referred in paragraph 5 of the present email show as to show your intentions and transparency in your dealings. Core Healthcare and Jatin Jalundhwala has failed to attend the Metropolitan court in December 2004 , March 2005 and April 2005 which shows that charge created by Jalundhwala was fraudulent.

3. In case , you fail to furnish details to the undersigned , then you are openly accepting that the creation of charge on Rupmanglam Investment Pvt Ltd property was done fraudulently and you have decided to encroaching on my rights of the immoveable property illegally and shamelessly with a deliberate intention to steal and grab the property and OBC management confirms that it is in collusion with management of GTB , Core Health Care and Sushil Handa and does not have any defence for the fraudulent acts.

4. Once again you are called upon to furnish a detailed reply to the present e mail as well as earlier emails to the undersigned while marking a copy of your detailed reply to the Gujarat High Court as well as Department of Banking Supervision simultaneously immediately on receipt of the present email but not later than evening of 7 ^th June 2005. The present email is being presented to the Judiciary as well as other crime investigating agencies.

5. Kindly furnish detailed reply to the following to start with :-

(a) That GTB has failed to furnish documentary evidence as to how Mr. Jatin Jalundhwala and Mr. Ameet Sesai continue as directors of Rupmanglam Investment Private Ltd after EXPIRY OF TERM AS ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR .GTB has failed to furnish any search report from ROC that the additional directorship of Jalundhwala and Desai stands renewed with written consent of Mody family directors and GTB management cannot plead ignorance that they do not know about such basic understanding while sanctioning facility.

(b) The copy of title deed register furnished to the court commissioner and the memorandum of entry furnished to the undersigned does not reflect any supporting documentary evidence that Mody family members have CEASED TO be directors of Rupmnglam Investment Pvt Ltd.

(c) The copy of title deeds registar and Memorandum of Entry furnished by GTB does not reflect ANY supporting evidence that Jatin Jalundhwala and Ameet Desai are SOLE, EXCLUSIVE directors of Rupmanglam Investment Pvt Ltd.

(d) That GTB has failed to include certificate from the auditors of Rupmanglam (Kashiparekhs ) that Ameet Desai and Jatin Jalundhwala are the SOLE Directors of Rupmanglam to create charge on immoveable property of Rupmanglam.

(e) That GTB has failed to furnish their internal appraisal report showing documentary evidence that Dhanyusha Financial , Jalundhwala and Core Health Care has received written confirmation from the ESCROW PERSONS CONSISTING OF Soparkar and Kashiparekh (as referred in the MOU ) that they have officially have handed over simultaneously all the documents as well as physical possession after obtaining no objection certificate from various mody family members including Pankaj Mody as far as property owned by Rupmangalam and Flovin .

(f) That GTB has failed to obtain concurrence from the auditors of Rupmangalam that Jalundhwala has all necessary authority and power to create charge on behalf of Legal shareholders and legal directors of Rupmangalam Investment Pvt ltd and such concurrence is not reflected in the tittle deeds register furnished by GTB to the court commissioner and the same is not reflected in copy of memorandum of entry furnished to Pankaj Mody .

(g) That GTB has failed to show any documentary evidence in title deeds registar as well as Memorandum of entry that the stay of Revenue department has been lifted at the time of creation of charge in March 1999.

(h) That GTB has failed to deposit original sale document in favour of Shri Parbhulal Bhikhabhai Shah with the authorities while creating charge of Rupmangalm and Flovin confirming that charge creation was fraudulent.

(i) That GTB at the time of creation of charge has failed to adduce (i) sale deed document between Rupmnaglam and Dhanyuhsya that constructed portion of bunglow exclusively belonging to Rupmangalm has been sold to Dhanyushya (ii) sale deed document between Rupmanglam and Flovin that constructed portion of bunglow exclusively belonging to Rupmangalm has been sold to Flovin.

(j) That GTB has failed to furnish documentary evidence that GTB HAS thoroughly and minutely verified own their own that Span Medicals is the sole and exclusive legal owners of Final Plot 768/10 instead of blindly believing on any certificates.

(k) That GTB has failed to give any reasoning as why the sanction of loan was enhanced from Rs 11 crores to Rs 12.5 crores within six months.

(l) That GTB has failed to give reasons as to why they chose to give loan to Core Healthcare especially when the balance sheet of Core Health care depicted that one another bank had filed case against Core health care and the Core health care was already facing liquidity problems.

(m) That GTB has failed to give any explanation as to the reason why they wanted to extend facility to Core Healthcare with support of Jalundhwala when Core Healthcare extended approximately Rs 39 crores non-interest bearing loan to its subsidiary Technology Finance with Jalundhwala as its director .

(n) That GTB and OBC has failed to prove the legality of creation of charge by compelling Core healthcare and Jalundhwala and GTB officials to adduce necessary evidence in the criminal defamation case 3326/99 in light of correspondence from time to time.

(o) That GTB has not furnished detailed INTERNAL findings and written statements in light of letter addressed to them on 24-7-99.

PLEASE SEE THAT YOU ACKNOWLEDGE MY EMAIL FORTHWWITH AND ALSO GIVE DETAILED REPLY 7 ^TH JUNE 2005.

Yours sincerely,

Pankaj S Mody

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: pankaj mody <modyps@gmail.com>
Date: May 5, 2005 4:28 PM
Subject: ERSTWHILE GLOBAL TRUST BANK ON CG ROAD -AHMEDABAD GIVING FRAUDULENTLY LOAN OF RS 12.5 CRORES TO CORE HEATLH CARE BY CREATING CHARGE ON IMMOVEABLE PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR PARIMAL CROSSING -AHMEDABAD
To: rh_ahm@obc.co.in, mailto:edp_ahm@obc.co.in, helpahmedabad@rbi.org.in, rbbarman@rbi.org.in, cmd@obc.co.in, akmishra@obc.co.in, dbsahmedabad@rbi.org.in
Cc: hcguj@guj.nic.in, cvc@alpha.nic.in, pshome@gujarat.gov.in, suchetadalal@yahoo.com, manubhai_cerc@hotmail.com, mailto:sg@expressindia.com

TOP PRIORITY

FROM :

PANKAJ S MODY

2^ND FLOOR , JANMANGAL APT

40 BMM SOCIETY , PALDI

AHMEDABAD 380 006

EMAIL: mailto:modyps@gmail.com

5^th May 2005

The Regional Head

1)

ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

CHANAKAYA, 4^TH FLOOR,NEAR DINESH HALL

OFF ASHRAM ROAD

AHMEDABAD

PHONE 26587539,26585830, FAX 26589456

EMAIL: rh_ahm@obc.co.in, edp_ahm@obc.co.in

2) ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE

G-2 SAMEDH, NEAR ASSOCIATED PETROL PUMP

CG ROAD, AHMEDABAD

FAX 91-79-26405597,

PHONE:- 26405595,

SIR,

SUBJECT : GTB BRANCH on CG Road in Ahmedabad extending of term loan of Rs 12.5 crores to Core health care by creating charge on immoveable property under signature of Jatin jalundhwala.

This is in continuation to my email dated 27-12-2004 and the reply dated 16-2-2005 of EGTB –CG Road branch in Ahmedabad given to the undersigned after affixing possession notice dated 31-1-2005 on the immoveable property. Their excuses show the guilty conscience.

From your reply it is clear that the management of OBC is behaving like ostrich sinking its head in the sand so as to turn a blind eye so as to grab illegally the possession of the property by encroaching and trespassing the immoveable property. Your excuse that the matter is sub-judice is to veil illegal acts of grabbing the property.

It is obligatory on the part of management of OBC to maintain clean , ethical transparent and honest approach and I therefore look forward to your detailed reply by email latest by 8 ^th May 2005 to me as well as to the Honourable Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court (reference email hcguj@guj.nic.in ) especially when GTB has not attended the court proceedings in Gujarat High Court pertaining to the Appeal from order 176/2003. I need to have detailed reply to the various points referred in the enclosure from the management of OBC latest by 8^th May 2005 to the various points referred in the ANNEXURE A.

Your failure to do so would construe that you lack conviction about legality of the charge on the immoveable property referred in suit 5827/2001and the management of OBC wants to openly and shamelessly shield Sushil Handa as well as the management of GTB and OBC would be considered as a crook banker for concealing and suppressing vital facts and the bank cannot be trusted to follow standard of ethics.

The present email is a public exposure so that the depositors and the public at large can judge ethical standards on part of OBC . I am giving wide awareness so that depositors can decide whether OBC is also taking route of GTB . Let every one see whether OBC openly blows a whistle or not to expose the scamsters such as Sushil Handa and Ramesh Gelli as well as other colluders promptly or not. This would test the bank's authenticity , conviction, honesty, sincerity and openness.

You shall immediately send a copy of the present email to EGTB branch on CG Road in Ahmedabad by fax as well as the other connected officials in OBC for immediate action as well as report findings to the Honorable Chief Justice of Gujarat High Court .

I reserve my right to draw attention of other additional points. A copy has been marked to Gujarat High Court for drawing the attention of judiciary on account of indifference and lack of transparency from your side.

Kindly acknowledge receipt of my email.

Yours sincerely,

Pankaj S Mody.

ENCLOSURE A

1. At the time of appraisal , GTB officers would have carried out minute verification as part of due diligence exercise as to why Jatin Jalundhwala would want to create charge on immoveable property so that GTB decided extend Rs 12.5 crores to Core Health care especially when it would not derive any benefit to the shareholders of Rupmangalam and Flovin.

2. GTB officers at the time of appraisal as part of due diligence exercise would have carried out search of ROC records by paying search fees with ROC prior to August 1998. They would have further observed that Jatin Jalundhwala had not filed any audited balances sheet pertaining to Rupmangalm Investment Pvt Ltd and Flovin Plastics Pvt Ltd under his signature as director along with the signature of the auditors Kashiparekhs. This due diligence exercise has been deliberately avoided in collusion with each other.

3. GTB officers at the time of appraisal in 1998 would have noticed from ROC records that Dhanyushaya had not submitted any balance sheet which showed that they were the sole shareholders of Rupmanglam and Flovin so as to allow legal directors of Rupmangalam and Flovin to create legal charge on immoveable property . GTB officers as well as OBC management would have such legal knowledge that without concurrence of the legal shareholders it is not possible to create charge on immoveable property. Neither GTB officials nor OBC bank officials can plead ignorance and/or play blind.

4. The GTB management has openly flouted the stay orders passed by the Revenue department of Gujarat Government at the time of creation of charge in August 1998 for Rs 11 crores as evident from the record of right 7/12. The bank documentation furnished in the court proceedings does not show that the stay was lifted by revenue department at the time of creation of charge and this shows that Jatin Jalundhwala had colluded with the management of GTB to create charge on immoveable property illegally as well as fraudulently.

5. It has been standard and prudent practice of any conservative banker to collect the background history by going through the papers such as memorandum of understandings and seek detailed clarification as to when Mr. Jalundhwala has received the documents of ownership from the escrow persons consisting of Hemant Kashiparekh and Saurabh Soparkar along with their written notarized affidavit especially when the amount of loan exceeds Rs 10 crores. This has not been done by the officers of Global Trust Bank at the time of appraisal.

6. GTB officials as well as OBC officials cannot take a stand of ignorance that the presence of any additional director gives an automatic right to the so called additional director to continue beyond next annual general meeting.

7. GTB officials as well as OBC officials would have atleast sense to understand that once the term of additional director expires then such so called additional director after his term as additional director does not have any authority to accept resignation of any director. Neither GTB officials nor OBC officials can plead ignorance to such fundamentals.

8. GTB officials would have known from the court proceedings that Jatin Jalundhwala and Dhanyushaya has failed to furnish various documents to the court commissioner as well as to the Judiciary following documents as referred in para nine of the Appeal from order:- http://www.afo176.blogspot.com/

· Statutory records such as minute book of directors and shareholders of Rupmanglam .

· Share certificates pertaining to Rupmangalam .

· Share transfer forms pertaining to Rupmangalam

· Share Registar of Rupmangalam

· Audited balance sheet from 96 onwards in relation to Rupmangalm along with acknowledgment of income tax returns filed and assessment orders.

· 37I permission from the income tax department in relation to the property owned by Rupmangalam in particular.

· Copy of all documents furnished to the Registrar of companies along with copy of acknowledgment from 31-3-95.

· All correspondence with directors and shareholders .

· All correspondence and documents for availing facility from defendant 4.

· Auditor report for share transfer in respect of shares of Rupmangalam Investment

· Audited balance sheet of defendant 1 from 1996 onwards till date.

9. The management of OBC would furnish a detailed explanation of written arguments furnished by the undersigned to the judiciary so as to impart clarity of facts.

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/10/written-arguments-presented-by-mr-mody.html

http://mediagtbpsm.blogspot.com/2004/09/text-of-written-arguments-on-17-3-2003.html

10. GTB management at the time of appraisal facilites in 1998 is supposed to have studied Core Health Care balance sheets and is supposed to have observed that a case was filed against for recovery of dues and hence, GTB manangement must not have sanctioned term loan facilities at all to Core Health care Ltd.( Directors report of Core Health care for 96-97 referred that … " One of the lenders also took harsh action by initiating legal proceedings." Oriental Bank of officers ought to have taken criminal action against all the concerned officials of GTB in sanctioning the facilities of Core Healthcare and OBC management cannot be a mute spectator and turn a blind eye . Simultaneously OBC has to take criminal action against directors of Core Health care for colluding with the management of GTB.

11. GTB management of the time of appraisal facilities in 1998 must have observed that Core Healthcare had advanced interest-free loan to Technology Finance having Jatin Jalundhwala as the director of Technology Finance. Any prudent and conservative banker would have questioned the Board of Directors of Core Healthcare as to the reason why they are seeking interest bearing loan from GTB where Jatin Jalundhwala is signatory to creation of charge. This establishes collusion of GTB management with this group that GTB is helping them to siphon the funds to be utilized for the purpose other then those for which the loan was sought to be begged for. It would be apparent from the notice given to Core Healthcare on 12-1-2000 The following internet link shows the details :-

http://corehealthcare.blogspot.com/2004/08/notice-served-to-core-health-care-on.html

The extract of reply given by their advocate A D Shah makes it abundantly clear that that Core Healthcare do not have any valid explanation to offer. The reply extract is in form of a comment beneath the notice.

12. GTB management has not been able to explain in their letter dated 21-10-1999 as to the evidence of transfer of constructed portion of bunglow to Rupmanglam Investment Pvt Ltd claimed to be acquired by Dhanyushya Financial as referred in the letter addressed by Pankaj Mody on 24-7-1999 by producing registered sale deed document of constructed portion of bunglow in favour of Dhanyushya.

13. GTB while creating charge on assets of Rupmanglam and Flovin has not deposited the original title deeds of both the companies as per the particulars of documentation furnished to the judiciary and hence the connected GTB officers as well as Jatin JATIN JALUNDHWALA are liable for criminal action for colluding with each other. Why Oriental Bank of Commerce is not taking criminal action on Jatin Jalundhwala who is front man of Sushil Handa. By subjecting Jatin Jalundhwala to close interrogation before police and /or judiciary , various siphoning of funds by Sushil Handa can be found out as Jalundhwala being key employee of Core Health care.

14. How come GTB management at the time of sanction has not obtained auditors report (Kashiparekhs) in form of affidavit confirming that at the time of alleged transfer of companies that , Jatin Jalundhwala and Ameet Desai were truly holding directorship to accept the so called resignation of various mody family members. GTB has not furnished such evidence inspite of notice dated 21-12-99 by the undersigned.

15. It is necessary that OBC shall furnish detailed vigilance findings to the letter addressed to GTB on 24-7-1999. The same is appended here in the form of link as under:-

http://gtbcore.blogspot.com/2004_07_28_gtbcore_archive.html

16. It is necessary that OBC furnishes a detailed reply to the letter addressed by undersigned on 19-5-2004 as referred in the link as under:-

http://gtbcore.blogspot.com/2004_06_06_gtbcore_archive.html

17. GTB as well as Oriental Bank of Commerce cannot blindly and conveniently accept the so called judicial orders of amalgamation of various companies with Span Medicals. It is supposed to collect and verify all the supporting evidences from Jatin Jalundhwala while recording statement of directors of Span Medicals, Mrs Swati Soparkar –advocate who followed the procedures of amalgamation while taking written joint affidavits from Mr. Jatin Jalundhwala and the escrow persons , Mr. Hemant Kashiparekh and Mr. Saurabh Soparkar. When the officers of Oriental Bank of Commerce fails to take such action inspite of knowledge of court proceedings as well as my correspondence to them , then it clearly means that that the management of OBC is deliberately want to infringe on my rights by illegally encroaching and trespassing the immoveable property. In absence of such minute verification it is not ethical as well as legal to grab the possession of immoveable property on pretext that the same is exclusively owned by so called Span Medicals. This shows collusion of officers of Oriental Bank of Commerce to openly carry the loot.

18. What prevents OBC to take criminal action on Sushil Handa and Jatin Jalundhwala to attend the criminal defamation case 3326/99 launched by Core Health care in light of email to OBC on 27-12-2004 and thereby compel them to arrange other collateral while handing over the possession to the undersigned in light of the email sent to OBC on 27-12-2004.

19. You shall furnish copy of all the documents filed with ROC as regards to Core Health care , Dhanyushya Financial , Rupmangalam, Flovin, Span Medicals from 1996 onwards referring the details of document number and the date of creation of document with ROC.

20. GTB management has not demanded from Dhanyushya and Jalundhwala 37-I permission under Chapter XX- C OF THE Income Tax Act for showing constructed portion of bunglow property in Dhanyushaya which exclusively belonged to Rupmanglam as per the charge documents created and filed with ROC. In absence of 37-I permission the transfer of constructed property to Dhanyushya is void ab initio.

.

EMAIL TO OBC on 7th september 05

This is the property on which fraudulent charge is created by the management of Core Health care with help of their employee Jatin Jalundhwala in collusion with the management of GTB and now supported by management of Oriental Bank of Commerce who has colluded with the managment of Core Health care.

===================================================================================

pankaj mody
ANTI CORRUPTION BUREAU CONDUCTING INQUIRY ON CORE HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT AS WELL WITH THEIR BANKERS
pankaj mody
Wed, Sep 7, 2005 at 2:24 PM
To: cmd@obc.co.in, obc@obcindia.com, sckapur@obc.co.in, rmadhok@obc.co.in, dgsaxena@obc.co.in, akmishra@obc.co.in, asubramanian@obc.co.in, plahuja@obc.co.in, gksachdeva@obc.co.in, sheelsharma@obc.co.in, cmkhurana@obc.co.in, vidya.rudra@obcmail.co.in, rh_ahm@obc.co.in, edp_ahm@obc.co.in
Cc: computer department -acb cr-acb-ahd@gujarat.gov.in

From :Pankaj S Mody
2nd Floor , Janmangal Aparment
40 Brahman Mitra Mandal Society
Paldi , Ahmedabad 380 006
Email address : modyps@gmail.com


Date: 06-09-2005


TO:-

1) THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTORORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCENEW DELHIEmail : cmd@obc.co.in,
obc@obcindia.com

2)
The Various General Managers,
Oriental Bank of Commerce
New Delhi
sckapur@obc.co.in , rmadhok@obc.co.in
dgsaxena@obc.co.in, scgupta@obc.co.in,
akmishra@obc.co.in, asubramanian@obc.co.in ,
plahuja@obc.co.in, gksachdeva@obc.co.in,
sheelsharma@obc.co.in , cmkhurana@obc.co.in,
(3)
THE REGIONAL HEAD ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCECHANAYKYA , 4TH FLOOR, NEAR DINESH HALLOFF ASHRAM ROADPHONE: 26587539,26585830, FAX 26589456Email : rh_ahm@obc.co.in , edp_ahm@obc.co.in4)Erstwhile Global Trust BankG-2 SAMEDH, NEAR ASSOCIATED PETROL PUMP C.G. ROADAHMEDABADPHONE : 91-79-26405595, FAX 91-79-26405597vidya.rudra@obcmail.co.in


Sir,


Kindly refer to the news item "CPI sues defaulters in Gujarat" in Business standard recently as per the link shown as under:-

http://www.business-standard.com/common/storypage.php?storyflag=y&amp;amp;amp;amp;leftnm=lmnu2&leftindx=2&lselect=1&chklogin=N&autono=198722

I do hope that you have the courage to take initiative to furnish the affidavit of CMD of OBC in light of contents of my email on 20th August 2005 addressed to all of you. The present email is being sent to the Anti Corruption Bureau in Ahmedabad as they are conducting criminal inquiry as per the directions of Sessions Court to examine Core Health care management so as to examine the conduct of Core Health care as well as that of Oriental Bank of Commerce and other bankers under Prevention of Corruption Act. . I am furnishing text of email sent on 20th August 2005 to you as under:-

http://obccorresp.blogspot.com/2005_08_20_obccorresp_archive.html


I am marking the contents of my present email to the Anti Corruption Bureau so that they are able to observe whether you take the initiative on your own to file written affidavit or not and secondly, whether you volunteer to give detailed reply to my various emails backed by documentary evidences and reasoned reply .

As you had ample time, you should not have any difficulty to furnish these details in a day or two the Anti Corruption Bureau . In case you are not able to furnish a comprehensive reply to them immediately within a week of this email than , the OBC management has colluded with the management of Core Health care where by they have allowed them to go scot free deliberately and the officials protecting management of Core Health care automatically comes under investigation on c orruption .

When even a common person can visualize the fraudulent acts of Sushil Handa and his team while banker is not able to see it- means bankers that bankers are extending favours for a consideration.

You are digging your own grave to get trapped in clutches of Anti Corruption Bureau and the Sessions court of Ahmedabad . . The OBC management has caught the infection of GTB management of joining hands with crook borrower like Sushil Handa by not taking criminal action publicly.

The top management of OBC does not have hope to come out clean in case you do not drop illegal charge on property on one hand while filing criminal case against Core Health care management for being hands in glove with the management of GTB and there by cooperating with the Anti Corruption Bureau in larger interest of society . This is perhaps the only chance where you can save yourself provided you have this kind of foresight.

Kindly furnish a detailed reply backed by documentary evidences as well as affidavit to the undersigned as well as Anti Corruption Bureau.. Your failure to do so would go against the Oriental Bank of commerce management.


Yours sincerely,


Pankaj S Mody